The violence in Charlottesville has brought the reality and danger of racism once again to the front of America's attention. Sane voices across our nation are denouncing the ugly white supremacists and neo-Nazis who precipitated the violence. Leaders of our Church have been unequivocal in deploring the hate that permeated the event. Such statements are important to show solidarity with our brothers and sisters who are suffering from racism. A good example is the statement issued by our local Commission of Religious Leaders. It is altogether right that all people of good will should say these things
But, in a way, it's easy to denounce racism as a grave sin, a blight on the history of our nation, a malign force that denigrates and devalues people every day that has led to countless deaths and injuries. Nobody who isn't infected by the sin would disagree
I'm going to annoy peoply by saying it, but a commonplace bare denunciation of racism as evil doesn't really say enough — it's a tautology, a circular statement that is equivalent to saying "a bad thing is bad". And to make things worse, the news media wastes too much time comparing the strength of various statements against racism, which just gives people a chance to compete with each other in "virtue signaling"
This issue is too serious. We have to call out the evil reality of what produces racism. The real enemy is not just racism, or any other -ism — it's the ideology of identity. And we won't be able to make any headway against racism until we pull this evil out in the open, discuss it plainly, and expose if for the diabolic lie that it is
It's natural for people to emphasize certain of their characteristics as they express their personality and values. That can be a good thing, especially if it fosters a sense of community and belonging and solidarity
But the ideology of identity is the weaponization of the wrong-headed and reductive idea that a person is defined by one of their characteristics (like race, or sex, or sexual desire). It focuses people exclusively and excessively on their own desires and choices and self-image, and demands that others accept their personal identity definition at all costs regardless of its relationship with the truth. It impairs our ability to truly understand ourselves in all our complexity, and to seek out the common elements that unite us with others. It says to outsiders that we cannot conceivably understand each other, and labels anyone who dares to doubt or disagree or question as a "hater"
As a result, it splinters society into a myriad of mutually exclusive and incomprehensible fragments that are in perpetual conflict of all against all. It leads to the ugly identity politics that we are mired in right now, where the population is broken into factions and sects.
This dangerous attitude is fundamentally an anthropological error — a misconception of the nature of the human person. It denies the importance — and even the reality — of our common humanity
Let's go back to the seminal document of the Second Vatican Council, Nostra Aetate, for the essential truths:
5. We cannot truly call on God, the Father of all, if we refuse to treat in a brotherly way any man, created as he is in the image of God. Man's relation to God the Father and his relation to men his brothers are so linked together that Scripture says: "He who does not love does not know God" (1 John 4:8).
No foundation therefore remains for any theory or practice that leads to discrimination between man and man or people and people, so far as their human dignity and the rights flowing from it are concerned.
The Church reproves, as foreign to the mind of Christ, any discrimination against men or harassment of them because of their race, color, condition of life, or religion. On the contrary, following in the footsteps of the holy Apostles Peter and Paul, this sacred synod ardently implores the Christian faithful to "maintain good fellowship among the nations" (1 Peter 2:12), and, if possible, to live for their part in peace with all men, so that they may truly be sons of the Father who is in heaven.
That is the fundamental truth that we have to keep talking about, because we obviously can't take it for granted that everyone understands or agrees. We need to make the argument very plainly that every person is a member of one family and is a child of God. We have to hold to the truth that people aren't defined by particular characteristics, but that their real identity and dignity transcend any one factor
By making that key point, we will be able to argue very clearly that racism isn't bad just because we don't like it and it's socially unacceptable. It's bad because it's irrational and idiotic and a lie to consider a person to be inferior based on their skin color or their nation of origin or ancestry. And, just like all other kinds of identity ideology, it is reductive and dehumanizing to look at people as a mere exemplar of a particular characteristic
If you want an example of how to confront these kinds of virulent falsehoods head-on, read Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail, or Abraham Lincoln's arguments against slavery or Frederick Douglass' orations. They go right to the root of the argument, and don't shy away from arguing first principles. We need to emulate them
As I said, it's laudable and important to deplore the evils that happened at Charlottesville. But we are in a desperate fight over the nature of the human person and the inherent dignity of every child of God. We can't rely on facile denunciations. We must make the argument against the evil of identity ideology, or we will never convince anyone of the wrong of racism
[Comments or questions? Email me at firstname.lastname@example.org]