Notre Dame University has long held itself out as an exemplar of Catholic higher education. And in fact, they have had a great many admirable Catholic scholars, and wonderful Catholic alumni. But they have clearly lost sight of what Catholic education is meant to be.
The University has decided to grant their Laeatare Medal (the name means "rejoice") to Joseph Biden, the Vice President of the United States. According to their website, this award "is presented annually to an American Catholic in recognition of outstanding service to the Church and society".
There is nothing to "rejoice" about in Joe Biden's public record. I dare anyone to identify anything that Joe Biden has done in service of the Church that can in any way be described as "outstanding". Indeed, in their
, the university didn't even bother to try to describe any such service. I also dare anyone to make sense of Notre Dame's incoherent argument that by honoring the man, they are not endorsing his policy positions. After all, what "service to society" has he given, except by his public acts?
The fact of the matter is that Mr. Biden has a long track record of public policy positions that are in direct contradiction to the Catholic faith, and that flout the specific and grave duties of a Catholic public servant. Specifically, he has long been a supporter of abortion. When in the Senate, his voting record can only be described as "mixed", with some pro-life votes (including votes in favor of the partial birth abortion ban), but an increasing number of pro-abortion votes in recent years. He was a very prominent front man for the Administration's endorsement of the redefinition of marriage. And he has done nothing publicly to defend the Church's religious liberty by mitigating his Administration's iniquitous contraception/abortion health insurance mandate, and, in fact, publicly defended it with an
during the 2012 campaign.
But don't just take my word about his attitude about abortion rights, listen to what he wrote:
I remember vividly the first time, in 1973, I had to go to the floor to vote on abortion. A fellow Senator asked how I would vote. “My position is that I am personally opposed to abortion, but I don’t think I have a right to impose my few on the rest of society. I’ve thought a lot about it, and my position probably doesn’t please anyone. I think the government should stay out completely. I will not vote to overturn the Court’s decision. I will not vote to curtail a woman’s right to choose abortion. But I will also not vote to use federal funds to fund abortion.“ I’ve stuck to my middle-of-the-road position on abortion for more than 30 years. I still vote against partial birth abortion and federal funding, and I’d like to make it easier for scared young mothers to choose not to have an abortion, but I will also vote against a constitutional amendment that strips a woman of her right to make her own choice.
Now, contrast that with the authentic teaching of the Church about the duties of a public servant:
Failing to protect the lives of innocent and defenseless members of the human race is to sin against justice. Those who formulate law therefore have an obligation in conscience to work toward correcting morally defective laws, lest they be guilty of cooperating in evil and in sinning against the common good. (US Bishops, Catholics in Political Life)
Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection.... In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore never licit to obey it, or to "take part in a propaganda campaign in favour of such a law, or vote for it." (St. John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae 73)
Presumably, these official Church documents are available somewhere in the Notre Dame library.
This tragic decision represents yet another example of the complete failure -- and in some cases, contumacious refusal -- of many institutions of Catholic education to understand their role and nature. In his Apostolic Constitution
Ex Corde Ecclesiae
, St. John Paul made clear that the necessity of acting in accordance with Catholic identity is one of the core obligations of a self-described Catholic university:
Ex Corde Ecclesiae
Catholic teaching and discipline are to influence all university activities, while the freedom of conscience of each person is to be fully respected. Any official action or commitment of the University is to be in accord with its Catholic identity. (General Norms, Article 2, §4, emphasis added)
also emphasizes that "the institutional fidelity of the University to the Christian message includes a recognition of and adherence to the teaching authority of the Church in matters of faith and morals." (27)
Notre Dame's decision to honor the Vice President is just another confirmation of a sad state of American universities that once were Catholic, but are now something lesser. Notre Dame, of course, is named after Our Blessed Mother. I cannot imagine her rejoicing at this decision made in her name.